Trump’s hesitation on relief bill will delay aid payments

WASHINGTON — The $900 bil­lion eco­nom­ic relief pack­age that Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump signed over the week­end will deliv­er vital aid to mil­lions of strug­gling house­holds and busi­ness­es. Yet his near­ly one-week delay in sign­ing the bill means that it will take that much longer for the finan­cial sup­port to arrive.

The pack­age that Trump signed at his pri­vate club in Flori­da on Sun­day will extend two unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fit pro­grams pro­vid­ing aid to 14 mil­lion peo­ple that expired last week. It will also pro­vide small busi­ness loans and up to $600 in cash pay­ments to most indi­vid­u­als. In addi­tion, it extends a mora­to­ri­um on evic­tions for one month. The mea­sure does not include aid for states and local­i­ties that are being forced to turn to lay­offs and ser­vice cuts as their tax rev­enue dries up — a poten­tial long-run drag on the economy.

The leg­is­la­tion extends the two fed­er­al job­less aid pro­grams until mid-March and adds a $300 sup­ple­men­tal week­ly pay­ment. But because Trump signed the bill on Sun­day, a day after the two pro­grams lapsed, that could cost the unem­ployed a week of ben­e­fits, with pay­ments not restart­ing until next week.

“The date was real­ly unfor­tu­nate,” said Michele Ever­more, a senior pol­i­cy ana­lyst at the Nation­al Employ­ment Law Project, a work­ers’ advo­ca­cy group. “Now there’s some ques­tion as to when this gets paid out.”

It is pos­si­ble that the Labor Depart­ment will inter­pret the law to allow pay­ments for the week end­ing Jan. 2, Ever­more said. But if the bill had been signed Sat­ur­day, pay­ments clear­ly could have restart­ed this week.

And it will like­ly take two to three weeks for states to update their com­put­er sys­tems to resume the aid pro­grams and pay out the extra $300, Ever­more said, a process that could have start­ed ear­li­er, after Con­gress first approved the bill about a week ago.

The delay will force those out of work to make hard deci­sions about pay­ing for food, med­i­cine or rent.

“These are peo­ple who have been liv­ing in pover­ty for months,” she said. “Any delay is an immense hardship.”

Months from now, econ­o­mists say, the wide­spread dis­tri­b­u­tion and use of vac­cines could poten­tial­ly unleash a robust eco­nom­ic rebound as the virus is quashed, busi­ness­es reopen, hir­ing picks up and con­sumers spend freely again. Yet the aid like­ly won’t last long enough to sup­port strug­gling small busi­ness­es and the unem­ployed until the vac­cine has been broad­ly dis­trib­uted and a strong rebound has begun.

“Some aid is bet­ter than no aid,” said Gre­go­ry Daco, chief U.S. econ­o­mist at Oxford Eco­nom­ics. “It’s pos­i­tive. But it’s like­ly going to be insuf­fi­cient to bridge the gap from today until late spring or ear­ly sum­mer, when the health sit­u­a­tion ful­ly improves.”

Pres­i­dent-elect Joe Biden has said he will seek anoth­er relief pack­age soon after his inau­gu­ra­tion next month, set­ting up anoth­er polit­i­cal brawl giv­en that some Sen­ate Repub­li­cans have said that with vac­cines on the way, fur­ther gov­ern­ment aid may be unnecessary.

The new aid pack­age should boost the broad­er econ­o­my, accord­ing to Gold­man Sachs. Econ­o­mists at the invest­ment bank said late Sun­day that they are boost­ing their growth fore­cast for the first three months of next year to 5% at an annu­al rate, up from an ear­li­er esti­mate of 3%.

Much of that upgrade is based on the inclu­sion of $600 stim­u­lus checks, Gold­man econ­o­mists said.

Right now, how­ev­er, the econ­o­my is in a renewed slump as a resur­gent virus inten­si­fies hard­ships for busi­ness­es. Con­sumers have cut back on shop­ping, trav­el­ing, din­ing out and attend­ing sports and enter­tain­ment events. Key mea­sures of the econ­o­my — retail sales, appli­ca­tions for job­less aid, trav­el spend­ing — have weakened.

Rough­ly 14 mil­lion Amer­i­cans faced a cut­off of their fed­er­al unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits if Con­gress hadn’t agreed to the new pack­age after months of stale­mate. Per­haps 2 mil­lion Amer­i­cans would have been able to trans­fer to a state-run extend­ed ben­e­fit pro­gram, but the rest would have had no income at all. More than 4 mil­lion have already used all the unem­ploy­ment aid avail­able to them, which lasts 26 weeks in most states; they will be able to reapply.

A pro­gram that pro­vides unem­ploy­ment aid for self-employed and con­tract work­ers will now pay ben­e­fits for 50 weeks, up from 39. A fed­er­al pro­gram that pro­vides extend­ed ben­e­fits, on top of the 26 pro­vid­ed by most states, will also last for anoth­er 11 weeks.

Kathy Richard­son, 60, hopes to catch up on the car and rental pay­ments that she has fall­en behind on, now that she can reap­ply for unem­ploy­ment ben­e­fits. She start­ed receiv­ing job­less aid in the spring after she was laid off from her exec­u­tive assis­tant job at a den­tal prac­tice but the ben­e­fits ran out in November.

“If it hadn’t been for fam­i­ly and friends I’d be home­less,” she said. “It’s been very stressful.”

Richard­son, who lives in Over­land, Mis­souri, just out­side of St. Louis, had a Zoom inter­view for a new admin­is­tra­tive job Mon­day and was hope­ful about her prospects. She has applied for work at Wal­mart, Tar­get, and Burg­er King, she said, but was turned down because those com­pa­nies assume she will quit once she can find a job more con­sis­tent with her career.

Her 18-year old son received Christ­mas presents from her three sis­ters this year, but not from her.

“I told him, ‘Maybe we’ll have a spe­cial Christ­mas in July after I’ve gone back to work,” Richard­son said.

The much larg­er res­cue pack­age the gov­ern­ment enact­ed in March was wide­ly cred­it­ed with avert­ing a dis­as­ter. By inject­ing mon­ey quick­ly into the pock­ets of indi­vid­ual Amer­i­cans, it served to reduce pover­ty. But as much of that aid expired over the sum­mer, pover­ty grew. Many peo­ple ran through the $1,200 direct pay­ment checks that had been dis­trib­uted in April and May. And a sup­ple­men­tal $600 in job­less ben­e­fits expired over the summer.

Accord­ing to research by Bruce Mey­er at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go and two col­leagues, the U.S. pover­ty rate jumped from 9.3% in June to 11.7% in Novem­ber — an increase of near­ly 8 mil­lion people.

The new relief pack­age restores the Pay­check Pro­tec­tion Pro­gram, which offers for­giv­able loans to many busi­ness­es. But many small busi­ness­es com­plain that the pro­gram in the past was too restric­tive, requir­ing them to use most of the mon­ey on pay­roll and not enough for oth­er expens­es like rent, the cost of per­son­al pro­tec­tive equip­ment or oth­er supplies.

Accord­ing to the data firm Wom­ply, about one in five small busi­ness­es have closed since ear­ly spring. More than half of small busi­ness­es have just two months’ cash on hand or less, and one in six has two weeks or less of cash, accord­ing to a sur­vey by the Cen­sus Bureau.

“It’s not stim­u­lus — it’s a sur­vival plan,’ Michael Graetz, a Colum­bia Uni­ver­si­ty law pro­fes­sor who stud­ies tax and social poli­cies, said of the new relief pack­age. “Will it allow peo­ple to sur­vive for a lit­tle longer than they would have oth­er­wise, giv­en what was about to hap­pen at the end of the year? The answer is yes. Not doing it would have been malpractice.’

AP Busi­ness Writer Paul Wise­man in Wash­ing­ton con­tributed to this report.

(Vis­it­ed 1 times, 1 vis­its today)



Tags: design TT Mod­ell­bahn TT H0 N schal­ten mod­elleisen­bahn bahn spiele­max preise 

Ein Reichsmarschall von Adolf Hitler hatte auch Märklin Modelleisenbahn Modelle > read more

Schreibe einen Kommentar