Proposal to give Denver police raises in 2022 faces objections from council

It’s an awk­ward time for Den­ver police to be nego­ti­at­ing a new, two-year con­tract — giv­en the pandemic’s hit to the city bud­get and recent calls to defund police after their protest response — but the contract’s upcom­ing expi­ra­tion has forced that conversation.

And even before all of the details of a ten­ta­tive deal between the police union and Den­ver May­or Michael Hancock’s admin­is­tra­tion have been released pub­licly, the admin­is­tra­tion and the City Coun­cil are fight­ing about it.

The agree­ment would include a near­ly $5 mil­lion cut in what will like­ly be around a $250 mil­lion police bud­get next year but pay rais­es for offi­cers in 2022, even as Den­ver stares down his­toric rev­enue loss­es and manda­to­ry unpaid fur­lough days for oth­er city employ­ees.

It’s not yet clear when the ten­ta­tive agree­ment will be sent to the coun­cil for a vote, though the group has received brief­in­gs on its details. Rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Den­ver Police Pro­tec­tive Asso­ci­a­tion did not respond to requests for com­ment, and few addi­tion­al details of the pro­pos­al were available.

It’s a pru­dent agree­ment, May­or Michael Han­cock wrote to the coun­cil, and he urged them to approve it. Fail­ure to do so would be irre­spon­si­ble, he said.

The council’s involve­ment in the process start­ed on the wrong foot when its rep­re­sen­ta­tive was left out of the first days of nego­ti­a­tions — an acci­den­tal omis­sion, said Ryan Luby, spokesper­son for the city attorney’s office.

“It’s unfor­tu­nate and there’s no excuse for it,” said new­ly mint­ed Coun­cil Pres­i­dent Sta­cie Gilmore. “That’s where we real­ly need to shore this process up and have it lock sol­id, so that the cit­i­zens of Den­ver are tru­ly rep­re­sent­ed in this process.”

Some coun­cil mem­bers are also crit­i­ciz­ing the pro­posed con­tract as absurd and tone deaf con­sid­er­ing the city’s polit­i­cal cli­mate and tax shortfalls.

“It’s an insult to all of the city employ­ees who had to take much more (cuts) and are fac­ing poten­tial lay­offs next year,” said Lisa Calderón, chief of staff for Coun­cil­woman Can­di CdeBaca.

City depart­ments cut an aver­age of 5.4% of their bud­gets this year, said finance depart­ment spokesper­son Julie Smith, but the police department’s cut was 4.8%, or $12.1 million.

As the pan­dem­ic and reces­sion con­tin­ue, depart­ments will be asked to set aside more than 11% of their bud­gets next year, Smith said.

Coun­cil­man Chris Hinds said it’s dif­fi­cult to talk about a con­tract that’s such a big part of the city’s near­ly $1.5 bil­lion gen­er­al fund bud­get when the coun­cil has yet to see the rest of Hancock’s pro­posed 2021 budget.

“I have been frus­trat­ed with the lack of trans­paren­cy that we have,” he said.

Giv­en the expect­ed need for cuts to the over­all bud­get, Hinds shares CdeBaca’s con­cern about city employ­ees out­side the Depart­ment of Pub­lic Safety.

“They get scraps com­pared to the half bil­lion-plus annu­al bud­get our pub­lic safe­ty gets,” he said. “This is going to be a way dif­fer­ent con­ver­sa­tion than last year’s con­ver­sa­tion, and we will have to make tough calls.”

The pro­pos­al also comes amid pro­test­ers’ recent calls to defund Den­ver police — an effort that’s backed by Cde­Ba­ca, although she was unable to get col­leagues’ sup­port to put a defund­ing mea­sure on the Novem­ber bal­lot.

Despite the var­i­ous con­cerns, it’s unclear whether enough coun­cil mem­bers oppose the con­tract to reject it outright.

Coun­cil­man Kevin Fly­nn, for instance, said he sup­ports the pro­posed agree­ment. The police union agree­ment and bud­get are two sep­a­rate issues, he said, and the union has no say in how much mon­ey the coun­cil gives the department.

“Shift­ing funds from the depart­ment is not a con­trac­tu­al issue,” Fly­nn said in a text mes­sage. “The labor con­tract is sim­ply wages and ben­e­fits for those on the force.”

The contract’s $5 mil­lion in con­ces­sions from the union also meets the goal set by the city’s bud­get office, he said.

If the coun­cil did reject the agree­ment, it would go to arbi­tra­tion, said Mike Strott, a spokesper­son for Hancock.



Tags: design TT Mod­ell­bahn TT H0 N schal­ten mod­elleisen­bahn bahn spiele­max preise 

Ein Reichsmarschall von Adolf Hitler hatte auch Märklin Modelleisenbahn Modelle > read more

Schreibe einen Kommentar