AP FACT CHECK: Trump muddies facts on mail ballots, Kamala Harris

WASHINGTON — Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump is mud­dy­ing the facts about mail-in vot­ing and vice pres­i­den­tial can­di­date Kamala Har­ris on the eve of the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nation­al Convention.

Asked to dis­claim the racist con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry that Har­ris isn’t eli­gi­ble to serve in the White House because of her immi­grant par­ents, Trump repeat­ed­ly demurred and said he knew lit­tle about it, even as the false rumors swirled on social media over the past week. Har­ris unques­tion­ably meets the Constitution’s require­ments to be vice pres­i­dent. On Sun­day, Trump’s own White House chief of staff acknowl­edged her eligibility.

Trump also con­tin­ued to blast mail-in vot­ing as flawed and fraud­u­lent while insist­ing that absen­tee mail bal­lots, espe­cial­ly in states like Flori­da that he must win in Novem­ber, are quite fine and safe. There are lit­tle dif­fer­ences in secu­ri­ty mea­sures between the two.

His week­end claims capped a litany of dis­tor­tion and false­hoods fol­low­ing Joe Biden’s announce­ment of Har­ris as his run­ning mate. He mis­rep­re­sent­ed Biden’s posi­tion on tax­es, per­sist­ed in min­i­miz­ing the coro­n­avirus threat and exag­ger­at­ed his own record on the economy.

A look at the past week’s rhetoric, also cov­er­ing Social Secu­ri­ty and more:

MAIL VOTING

TRUMP: “Absen­tee is good; mail-in, uni­ver­sal is very, very bad. There’s no way they’re going to get it accu­rate­ly.” — news con­fer­ence Saturday.

TRUMP: “The hon­or­able thing to do is drop the Mail-In Scam before it is too late! Absen­tee Bal­lots, like they have in Flori­da, are good!” — tweet Saturday.

THE FACTS: He’s mak­ing a false dis­tinc­tion. Mail-in bal­lots are cast in the same way as absen­tee mail bal­lots, with the same lev­el of scruti­ny such as sig­na­ture ver­i­fi­ca­tion in many states.

In more than 30 states and the Dis­trict of Colum­bia, vot­ers have a right to “no excuse” absen­tee vot­ing. That means they can use mail-in bal­lots for any rea­son, regard­less of whether a per­son is out of town or work­ing. In Flori­da, the Leg­is­la­ture in 2016 vot­ed to change the word­ing of such bal­lot­ing from “absen­tee” to “vote-by-mail” to make clear a vot­er can cast such bal­lots if they wish.

More broad­ly, vot­er fraud has proved exceed­ing­ly rare. The Bren­nan Cen­ter for Jus­tice in 2017 ranked the risk of bal­lot fraud at 0.00004% to 0.0009%, based on stud­ies of past elections.

Only nine states cur­rent­ly have plans for “uni­ver­sal” mail-in vot­ing, where bal­lots are sent auto­mat­i­cal­ly to reg­is­tered vot­ers. Five of those states relied on mail-in bal­lots even before the coro­n­avirus pan­dem­ic raised con­cerns about vot­ing in person.

Blast­ing mail-in vot­ing, Trump in the past week said he may hold up fund­ing for the U.S. Postal Ser­vice to impede those votes across the 50 states.

“Trump is sim­ply wrong about mail-in bal­lot­ing rais­ing a ‘tremen­dous’ poten­tial for fraud,” Richard L. Hasen, an elec­tions expert at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Irvine, School of Law, wrote recent­ly. “While cer­tain pock­ets of the coun­try have seen their share of absen­tee-bal­lot scan­dals, prob­lems are extreme­ly rare in the five states that rely pri­mar­i­ly on vote-by-mail, includ­ing the heav­i­ly Repub­li­can state of Utah.”

White House chief of staff Mark Mead­ows said Sun­day on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Trump had request­ed a Flori­da absen­tee mail bal­lot to vote in November.


ON BIDEN-HARRIS

TRUMP, asked about social media claims that Har­ris is not eli­gi­ble to run for vice pres­i­dent because her par­ents were immi­grants to the U.S.: “I heard it today that she doesn’t meet the require­ments. … I have no idea if that’s right. I would have assumed that the Democ­rats would have checked that out.” — news con­fer­ence Thursday.

TRUMP, asked about the sub­ject again: “I have noth­ing to do with it. I read some­thing about it.”He added: “It’s not some­thing that both­ers me. … It’s not some­thing that we will be pur­su­ing.” Asked point blank if Har­ris is eli­gi­ble, Trump replied: “I just told you. I have not got into it in great detail.” — news con­fer­ence Saturday.

THE FACTS: Har­ris, a sen­a­tor from Cal­i­for­nia, is with­out ques­tion eligible.

Har­ris, 55, was born in Oak­land, Cal­i­for­nia, mak­ing her a nat­ur­al-born U.S. cit­i­zen and eli­gi­ble to be pres­i­dent if Biden were unable to serve a full term. Her father, an econ­o­mist from Jamaica, and her moth­er, a can­cer researcher from India, met at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Berke­ley, as grad­u­ate students.

The Con­sti­tu­tion requires a vice pres­i­dent to meet the eli­gi­bil­i­ty require­ments to be pres­i­dent. That includes being a nat­ur­al-born U.S. cit­i­zen, at least 35 years old and a res­i­dent in the U.S. for at least 14 years.

“I can’t believe peo­ple are mak­ing this idi­ot­ic com­ment,” Lau­rence Tribe, a Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty pro­fes­sor of con­sti­tu­tion­al law, told The Asso­ci­at­ed Press in 2019, when sim­i­lar false claims emerged about Har­ris dur­ing her pres­i­den­tial run.

“She is a nat­ur­al born cit­i­zen and there is no ques­tion about her eli­gi­bil­i­ty to run,” Tribe said.

On Sun­day, Mead­ows said he accept­ed that Har­ris is eli­gi­ble to serve as vice president.

“Sure,” said Mead­ows, when asked on CNN whether he acknowl­edges the fact that she meets the con­sti­tu­tion­al require­ments to be pres­i­dent or vice pres­i­dent. “And I think the pres­i­dent spoke to this yes­ter­day. This is not some­thing that we’re going to pursue.”

Har­ris is the first Black woman and Asian Amer­i­can to com­pete on a major party’s pres­i­den­tial tick­et. Trump in past years indulged in the false con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry that Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma was born abroad. Only after mount­ing pres­sure dur­ing his 2016 cam­paign did Trump dis­avow the claims.

• • •
TRUMP: “If Biden would win … he’s going to dou­ble and triple everybody’s tax­es.” — news con­fer­ence Wednesday.

THE FACTS: Trump is exag­ger­at­ing. Wild­ly so.

Biden would raise tax­es, pri­mar­i­ly on the wealthy. But a July esti­mate by the Com­mit­tee for a Respon­si­ble Fed­er­al Bud­get finds that the increase is a small frac­tion of what Trump claimed. The for­mer vice president’s plan would raise “tax­es for the top 1 per­cent of earn­ers by 13 to 18% of after-tax income, while indi­rect­ly increas­ing tax­es for most oth­er groups by 0.2 to 0.6%,” the non­par­ti­san group said.

To put that in per­spec­tive, tax col­lec­tions would increase by $3.4 tril­lion to $3.7 tril­lion over the next decade. That is a lot of mon­ey. But it’s not a dou­bling or tripling. The gov­ern­ment is on pace to col­lect $47 tril­lion over the next decade, so the Biden plan would be rough­ly be a 7.8% increase in revenues.

• • •
TRUMP CAMPAIGN: “Not long ago, Kamala Har­ris called Joe Biden a racist and asked for an apol­o­gy she nev­er received.” — state­ment Tues­day from Kat­ri­na Pier­son, Trump 2020 senior adviser.

THE FACTS: She nev­er called Biden a racist.

Pier­son appears to be refer­ring to Har­ris’ remarks dur­ing a Demo­c­ra­t­ic pri­ma­ry debate in Mia­mi in June 2019 when the Cal­i­for­nia sen­a­tor chal­lenged Biden’s record of oppos­ing bus­ing as a way to inte­grate schools in the 1970s.

Har­ris pref­aced her crit­i­cism by telling Biden at that time, “I do not believe you are a racist. I agree with you when you com­mit your­self to the impor­tance of find­ing com­mon ground.”

She then went on: “It was actu­al­ly hurt­ful to hear you talk about the rep­u­ta­tions of two Unit­ed States sen­a­tors who built their rep­u­ta­tions and career on the seg­re­ga­tion of race in this coun­try. It was not only that but you also worked with them to oppose busing.

“There was a lit­tle girl in Cal­i­for­nia who was part of the sec­ond class to inte­grate her pub­lic schools,” Har­ris said. “She was bused to school every day. That lit­tle girl was me.”

It was a break­through moment for Har­ris at the can­di­dates’ first debate, stun­ning Biden, who respond­ed that “he did not praise racists” and pro­vid­ed a hair­split­ting defense of his posi­tion on bus­ing. But she did not accuse him of being racist.


ECONOMY

TRUMP: “The man­u­fac­tur­ing sec­tor is boom­ing and the pro­duc­tion index is at the high­est read­ing since Octo­ber of ’18, which was an extra­or­di­nary peri­od of time.” — news con­fer­ence Wednesday.

THE FACTS: The pan­dem­ic crushed U.S. fac­to­ries and the dam­age per­sists. There is no boom.

Even after three months of job gains, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Sta­tis­tics shows the man­u­fac­tur­ing sec­tor has 740,000 few­er jobs than before the out­break. All the fac­to­ry hir­ing gains under Trump have dis­ap­peared. There were 257,000 more man­u­fac­tur­ing jobs on the day Trump became pres­i­dent than now. More impor­tant, the jobs recov­ery has shown signs of stalling. Just 26,000 fac­to­ry jobs were added in July, down from 357,000 added jobs in June.

The sec­tor has been recov­er­ing. Yet after increas­es in pro­duc­tion in June, the Fed­er­al Reserve said U.S. fac­to­ry out­put was run­ning 11.1% below pre-pan­dem­ic lev­els. Trump cit­ed one com­po­nent of an index com­posed by the Insti­tute for Sup­ply Man­age­ment that indi­cates fac­to­ry pro­duc­tion grew in July as well. It was the best read­ing since August of 2018, not Octo­ber as claimed by the pres­i­dent. But that same report showed that man­u­fac­tur­ers are also cut­ting back on employ­ment, sug­gest­ing that a boom has yet to begin.


SOCIAL SECURITY

TRUMP: “At the end of the year, the assump­tion that I win, I’m going to ter­mi­nate the pay­roll tax … We’ll be pay­ing into Social Secu­ri­ty through the gen­er­al fund.” — news con­fer­ence Wednesday.

THE FACTS: Under Trump’s pro­pos­al, Social Secu­ri­ty would lose its ded­i­cat­ed fund­ing source.

Pay­roll tax­es raise about $1 tril­lion annu­al­ly for Social Secu­ri­ty, and the pres­i­dent was uncon­cerned about the loss of those rev­enues. Trump cam­paign offi­cials stressed that the gen­er­al fund con­sists of assets and lia­bil­i­ties that finance gov­ern­ment oper­a­tions and could do so for Social Secu­ri­ty. The gen­er­al fund is nick­named “America’s Check­book” on the Trea­sury Department’s website.

The risk is that the loss of a ded­i­cat­ed fund­ing source could desta­bi­lize an anti-pover­ty pro­gram that pro­vides pay­ments to rough­ly 65 mil­lion Amer­i­cans. It also could force peo­ple to cut back on the spend­ing that dri­ves growth so they can save for their own retire­ment and health care needs if they believe the gov­ern­ment back­stop is in jeopardy.

A 12.4% pay­roll tax split between employ­ers and work­ers funds Social Secu­ri­ty, while a 2.9% pay­roll tax finances Medicare. The Social Secu­ri­ty tax raised rough­ly $1 tril­lion last year, accord­ing to gov­ern­ment fig­ures. Over a 10-year peri­od, Trump’s idea would blow a $13 tril­lion hole in a U.S. bud­get that is already laden with ris­ing debt loads.

Trump announced a pay­roll tax defer­ral through the end of the year, part of a series of moves to bypass Con­gress after talks on a broad­er coro­n­avirus relief bill that has stalled. He says he will make it a per­ma­nent tax cut with the help of Con­gress. Democ­rats have described that idea as a nonstarter.

White House press sec­re­tary Kayleigh McE­nany on Thurs­day sug­gest­ed to reporters that Trump mis­spoke when he said he would elim­i­nate the pay­roll tax if reelect­ed. She said the pres­i­dent would only push to make the pay­roll tax defer­rals per­ma­nent. But Trump clear­ly said that he would elim­i­nate the pay­roll tax four times at his Wednes­day press brief­ing and even answered a ques­tion about “per­ma­nent­ly” rescind­ing it.

• • •
TRUMP, asked how the gen­er­al fund can sus­tain the pay­ments: “We’re going to have tremen­dous growth. … You will see growth like you have not seen in a long time.” — news con­fer­ence Wednesday.

THE FACTS: It is high­ly unlike­ly that eco­nom­ic growth would be enough to off­set the loss of the pay­roll tax. Trump has a record of mak­ing wild­ly improb­a­ble growth pro­jec­tions. He sug­gest­ed that his 2017 income tax cuts would pro­pel eco­nom­ic growth as high as 6% annu­al­ly. That nev­er hap­pened. Growth reached 3% in 2018, then slumped to 2.2% and the U.S. econ­o­my crum­bled into reces­sion this year because of the coronavirus.


VIRUS THREAT

TRUMP: “You can’t com­pare it to 1917. That was incred­i­ble. That was — that was the worst ever by far. That was — you look at — they lost pos­si­bly 100 mil­lion peo­ple.” — news con­fer­ence Saturday.

TRUMP, on COVID-19: “Nobody under­stood it because nobody has ever seen any­thing like this. The clos­est thing is, in 1917, they say — right? The great — the great pan­dem­ic cer­tain­ly was a ter­ri­ble thing, where they lost, any­where from 50 to 100 mil­lion peo­ple. Prob­a­bly end­ed the Sec­ond World War; all the sol­diers were sick.” — news brief­ing on Aug. 10.

THE FACTS: He got the year wrong for the Span­ish flu, as he rou­tine­ly does, and may have over­stat­ed deaths from it. The pan­dem­ic spread from ear­ly 1918 to late 1920. It killed an esti­mat­ed 50 mil­lion world­wide, with about 675,000 of the deaths in the U.S., accord­ing to the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Prevention.

That pan­dem­ic did not end World War II, which came two decades later.

• • •
TRUMP: “We’re still in the pan­dem­ic, which will be going away, as I say, it will be going away. And they scream, how you can you say that? I said, because it’s going to be going away.” — inter­view Thurs­day on Fox Busi­ness Network.

THE FACTS: No mat­ter how many times he says it, the virus is not going to just mag­i­cal­ly disappear.

The virus is now blamed for more than 166,000 deaths and more than 5.2 mil­lion con­firmed infec­tions in the U.S. — eas­i­ly the high­est totals in the world. In the past week, the aver­age num­ber of new cas­es per day was on the rise in eight states, and deaths per day were climb­ing in 26, accord­ing to an Asso­ci­at­ed Press analysis.

Dr. Antho­ny Fau­ci, the government’s top infec­tious dis­eases offi­cial, has warned that increased cas­es across the South and West in par­tic­u­lar put “the entire coun­try at risk.” On Thurs­day, for instance, the rate of pos­i­tive virus cas­es in Texas soared to the high­est lev­els of the pan­dem­ic, with near­ly 1 in every 4 coro­n­avirus tests com­ing back pos­i­tive. Neva­da had its biggest dai­ly jump in coro­n­avirus fatal­i­ties to date.

In Feb­ru­ary, Trump assert­ed coro­n­avirus cas­es were going “very sub­stan­tial­ly down, not up,” and said it will be fine because “in April, sup­pos­ed­ly, it dies with the hot­ter weather.”

Fau­ci says there “cer­tain­ly” will be coro­n­avirus infec­tions in the fall and winter.

• • •
TRUMP, on whether he still thinks kids are essen­tial­ly immune from COVID-19: “Yeah, I think that, for the most part, they do very well. I mean, they — they don’t get very sick. They don’t catch it eas­i­ly.” — news brief­ing Tuesday.

THE FACTS: They aren’t immune, and he ignores racial dis­par­i­ties among those kids who get infected.

Although it’s true that chil­dren are less like­ly than adults to devel­op COVID-19, the CDC has nev­er­the­less count­ed more than 250,000 infec­tions by the virus in Amer­i­cans younger than 18, or rough­ly 7% of all cas­es. Racial dis­par­i­ties in the U.S. out­break also extend to chil­dren, with His­pan­ic and Black chil­dren with COVID-19 more like­ly to be hos­pi­tal­ized than white kids.

The total num­ber of kids who have been infect­ed but not con­firmed is almost cer­tain­ly far high­er than the CDC fig­ures, experts say, because those with mild or no symp­toms are less like­ly to get test­ed. Trump also gloss­es over the fact that kids can spread dis­ease with­out show­ing symp­toms themselves.

The CDC in May also warned doc­tors to be on the look­out for a rare but life-threat­en­ing inflam­ma­to­ry reac­tion in some chil­dren who’ve had the coro­n­avirus. The con­di­tion had been report­ed in more than 100 chil­dren in New York, and in some kids in sev­er­al oth­er states and in Europe, with some deaths.

Two recent gov­ern­ment reports laid bare the racial disparities.

One of the CDC reports looked at chil­dren with COVID-19 who need­ed hos­pi­tal­iza­tion. His­pan­ic chil­dren were hos­pi­tal­ized at a rate eight times high­er than white kids, and Black chil­dren were hos­pi­tal­ized at a rate five times high­er, it found.

The sec­ond report exam­ined cas­es of the rare virus-asso­ci­at­ed syn­drome in kids. It found that near­ly three-quar­ters of the chil­dren with the syn­drome were either His­pan­ic or Black, well above their rep­re­sen­ta­tion in the gen­er­al population.


NEW YORK VOTING

TRUMP: “Bal­lots are defraud­ed.” — news con­fer­ence Saturday.

TRUMP: “You just look at what hap­pened with the Car­olyn Mal­oney race. They should do that race over, by the way. … When you look at the bal­lot, the bal­lots that are miss­ing, and the bal­lot frauds — nobody knows what’s going on with that race, and yet they declared her a win­ner.” — news con­fer­ence Wednesday.

THE FACTS: There’s no evi­dence of fraud in the Demo­c­ra­t­ic con­gres­sion­al pri­ma­ry in New York City that was won by Demo­c­ra­t­ic Rep. Car­olyn Mal­oney. Nor did Trump offer any proof of fraud.

New York State decid­ed to allow any­one to vote by mail in the June pri­ma­ry because of the pan­dem­ic. More than 400,000 peo­ple vot­ed by absen­tee bal­lot in New York City, a fig­ure that was 10 times the num­ber of absen­tee bal­lots cast in the 2016 primary.

Open­ing and count­ing those bal­lots by elec­tions offi­cials took weeks, lead­ing to a legal dis­pute over non­fraud issues, such as miss­ing post­marks. Can­di­dates observ­ing the count say that thou­sands of bal­lots were dis­qual­i­fied because of tech­ni­cal errors vot­ers wouldn’t have encoun­tered if they had vot­ed in per­son, like prob­lems with their signature.

New York City’s Board of Elec­tions ulti­mate­ly cer­ti­fied the results six weeks after the election.

Asso­ci­at­ed Press writ­ers Aman­da Seitz in Chica­go, and Lau­ran Neer­gaard, Aamer Mad­hani and Dar­lene Superville in Wash­ing­ton con­tributed to this report.

EDITOR’S NOTE — A look at the verac­i­ty of claims by polit­i­cal figures.



Tags: design TT Mod­ell­bahn TT H0 N schal­ten mod­elleisen­bahn bahn spiele­max preise 

Ein Reichsmarschall von Adolf Hitler hatte auch Märklin Modelleisenbahn Modelle > read more

Schreibe einen Kommentar